Monthly Archives: August 2012

Columnists
August 31, 2012 posted by Tim Stillman

We could be Germans, just for one day

We could be Germans, just for one day

Assembling this week’s column has been a difficult undertaking. The transfer deadline arrives imminently and, at time of writing, there are still so many issues to settle. Circumstances alter at light speed and that’s going to feel like a gentle cruise compared to what this evening will bring. Even for someone like me that has an allergy to transfer speculation (I used to refer to it as ‘speculitis’ but that sounds like an unfortunate ailment one might catch at a mate’s stag do) last season’s deadline day had the feel of watching someone nervously clipping wires on a time bomb.

This weekend we have a huge game at Liverpool, but it’s hard to pay it any mind because we don’t have much idea about who will be available for selection. Hardly ideal for the team in terms of preparation. I really did hold hope that deadline day this year would be more about possibility picking up another utility player if the fancy tickled us. As it stands, I think the squad looks unbalanced. There’s depth, but it lacks variety. The midfielders and the forwards are largely cut from similar cloth. Whether that impression is maintained come Saturday remains to be seen.

The dominant story of the last few days has been of “TJ and the multi million pound contract negotiation.” Again it’s a plot that twists by the hour, contorted by the hands of agents, spokesmen, journalists with a brief. It’s a full on spin war reminiscent of an episode of ‘The Thick of It.’ (What I wouldn’t give for Malcolm Tucker  to conduct our transfer negotiations). As I write, the word from the boss is that he has yet to sign, but won’t be sold during this window. By the time this goes to press, he’ll have probably signed for Melchester Rovers.

Thing is, if Theo was the only departure this summer, I think I’d have forgotten his name before he got to the car park. But last summer, Arsene himself said losing three players from your starting XI is “a huge technical risk.” I’m not sure how one would describe doing so in consecutive summers. I’ll leave that to your imagination. But quite why Walcott’s situation has been allowed to get to the frantically snipping wires stage I genuinely have no idea.

It has to be said the idea of Arsenal being held to ransom by Theo Walcott is rather surreal. Like that time when you were a teenager and that little eleven year old pipsqueak started giving you lip and jip. But just as you were about to give him a clip round the ear and tell him to scram, you eye his much older, much bigger and much more psychopathic brother lurking in the background.

The Walcott situation represents an uncomfortable bridge between bifurcate issues. Pay another player over and above his worth or do we lose another component from our starting XI? Especially since our new look team is still heating slowly in the kiln. Theo himself embodies this quandary. He’s reportedly asking for £100k a week, yet nobody much seems interested in buying him. Perhaps an argument could be made that the lack of existing cohesion (particularly upfront) would have made it easier to lose Theo now.

We’re already ripping up the skirting board; new curtains are hardly going to disrupt the ambience of the room. He has no relationship to speak of with Giroud or Podolski and Gervinho already brings many of Walcott’s strengths (and frustrating flaws). Assuming the hypothetical sale of Walcott were offset with a replacement (I know, I know) it could be beneficial. We could supplement the front three with greater variety, that creative presence that opens defences with sleight of foot or a swivel of the hips. A paintbrush in amongst the jackhammers. Even with Theo, I think we miss an artiste in the front line.

And just as I’m about to get carried away with the hypotheses and the theorising a thought occurs. “Shit the bed. IT’S AUGUST THE FUCKING 31st!!” It would all have sounded so plausible in July. Still, on the bright side, all this confusion and uncertainty makes it a reet bitch for our next few opponents to scout us. No real combinations have been forged yet, there’s little to no choreography to analyse and therefore prevent.

Eat that Brendan Rodgers; even we don’t know how we’re going to play on Sunday! Imagine trying to deal with that in a team talk. “Right boys, as you know, Arsenal’s winner at Anfield last season came when Alex Song dinked a ball over the top for Robin van Persie so we have to … oh, wait a minute.” We’ll turn up with Chamakh in defensive midfield, after an article appears on arsenal.com on Saturday morning declaring him to be “a pass master.” (I remind you dear reader, despairingly, of this).

I understand the way market forces work. I recognise that transfers are a domino effect and the pieces don’t really start tumbling until late August. (Spurs are only just putting a strike-force together, even City are still haggling for a winger). But being in a position where we’re still looking for starting XI type players come deadline day doesn’t suggest a strategic, well thought out approach to squad construction. The sting of losing van Persie was offset by promising arrivals, but now we’ve got the handbrake on again.

As it stands, Song has been sold and remains unreplaced (the pursuit of Sahin is proof positive that the manager believes that he needs to be replaced too) and the Walcott situation looks a mess frankly. That said, I’ve been quietly impressed by the new boys. Physical examinations in the Premier League don’t come much more, ahem, “boisterous” than Stoke and none looked perturbed on that score. Buying players of around 26-27 years of age theoretically means they acclimatise environmentally more quickly. I like Giroud’s hunky fearlessness, perhaps there’s a grain of truth in the argument that he’s trying too hard.

I don’t blame him for taking on that last minute long range effort with Ramsey seemingly in a better position. I think television pictures might have made that decision look more selfish than it was. I was stationed behind the goal Giroud took aim for and I didn’t see Ramsey myself until the shot had already been taken. When you take on an effort like that, you make your mind up very early. If you look at Ramsey’s position at the instant the ball arrives with Giroud, you see it’s actually a trickier pass than it looks- even if he hasn’t already decided to shoot early.

A word on the Champions League draw, which, it has to be said, was quite good to us. All teams at this level are dangerous, but if we don’t get through this group, well, we’ll have been force fed our just desserts. Having scouted Olivier Giroud so intently, you’d imagine somebody at the club will have compiled a workable impression of the challenges Montpellier pose. From a travelling point of view, I always love to draw a German team.

It must be said, I’m a raging teutophile in broad terms, but ze Germans do football properly. Safe standing? Not a problem. “Please sir, can I sup a beer inside the stadium? I promise I won’t go all Bruce Banner on you and start cracking skulls.” Why of course you can, you’re an adult! Affordable ticket prices, superb atmosphere, what’s not to love? And more importantly, why aren’t we shamelessly aping them? Till next week. LD.

Follow me on Twitter @LittleDutchVA

Arsecast
August 31, 2012 posted by arseblog

Risky business as deadline day arrives + Arsecast 246

Risky business as deadline day arrives + Arsecast 246

Morning all.

It is upon us, at last. The transfer deadline. Tonight, the window shuts at 11pm and after that it’s a case you have what you hold and that group of players will be tasked with taking us through until January, at least. It does look like there’ll be some departures with stories about Nicklas Bendtner having a medical this morning with Juventus, Ju Young Park traveling to Celta Vigo and there’s talk of Chamakh and Malaga but I’m a bit dubious about that one.

They’ve just signed Roque Santa Cruz from Man City and Javier Saviola from wherever the hell he’s been playing so perhaps their need for a striker is not that pressing. It seems almost mean to sign Cazorla then lump them with the Moroccan but hey-ho. Interestingly, however, Diario Sur, a local paper for local people, says they need themselves a centre-half and knowing that Arsenal have no real need for Sebastian Squillaci they might make a move in that direction. Which would be nice.

As for those coming in, your guess is as good as mine. Arsene says we’re ‘active’ in the transfer market:

We are working very, very hard. We are active but we do not just want to bring average players in. If we find a special player who can find us a plus we will do it, if not we will not do it.

You always want to improve your squad … but we believe strongly that we have the quality in our squad to do very well. We have already bought Cazorla, Podolski and Giroud of course.

Of course! And it’s trying to decipher Arsene’s double-speak, qualify everything stuff that makes people go a little bit bonkers. Imagine him at home.

“Arsene, would you like some dinner?”

“Yes, I am interested in dinner if I can find the right food, but I don’t just want a cheese sandwich. I’ll have the filet mignon but if not I will go without for I did partake of Rob the Chef’s cottage pie earlier. It was very satisfying. But if there’s a duck a l’orange available I’ll for that. But not a Pot Noodle.”

“FFS!”

So, we could very well sign players. We could just as easily not. As I’ve said already I really think this is a squad which needs some additions if we really want to compete for the title. I think we’re a striker light, a midfielder light and possibly another wide player but of course much will depend on who goes out. If Arshavin stays, for example, I think there’s little chance of us signing a wide man, but it would be nice to see someone come in who could offer something different to what we already have.

Obviously the manager is looking at Podolski and Giroud as his two main strikers, and reminding people it took even the best players time to settle into their new club, but beyond that we don’t have much should they suffer injury, suspension or loss of form. Especially as we’re (hopefully) moving on the trio mentioned above. To go into a season with just two strikers, one of whom is more of a wide man than a centre forward would be a massive gamble in my opinion, so fingers crossed something stirs before 11pm tonight.

For those of you who follow the day with great interest, we’re running a live blog over on Arseblog News. It’ll update automatically throughout the day with all Arsenal related transfer news (and probably stuff that other clubs are doing too so we can go ‘Ooooooh, look at who X signed! Why didn’t we sign them? DAMN YOU, DAMN YOU ALL TO HELL!’, and such). We’ll be with you right through until the deadline, we’ve got coffee for daylight hours, beer and pizza for darkness, and the number of our local Samaritans office at hand, so feel free to log on and ‘enjoy’ the day that’s in it.

Click here for the transfer deadline day live blog

In other news, the manager says that Theo Walcott will stay with us and will not be sold during this transfer window, even though no agreement has been reached over a new deal. Arsene says:

His situation is simple – he will stay with us and play for us. Theo has one year to go and that is simple. We have to find an agreement with him on whether to extend the contract or not for a longer period. That is what we want to do.

Which is interesting because back in August Wenger said when talking about van Persie:

When you can’t succeed in extending the contract of a player that is in its last year, there is no other way but to let him go.

Which suggests there’s either a change of policy or that there’s no place to let Theo go to. I still think it’s kind of mad to let a player’s contract reach this stage but maybe there just isn’t the required will on either side to make it happen. We’ve secured Kos and Vermaelen with little or no fuss and if we really, really wanted to keep Walcott and if Walcott really, really wanted to stay with us it’d be done.

I’ll happily be proved wrong (not for the first time!) but if I had to put money on it today I’d say Theo will see out his deal and leave on a Bosman. He’d be mad not to consider his options at least, and we have to hope that if he stays he’s focused and doesn’t suffer from the final year ‘difficulties’ that players like Edu and Wiltord did. They found themselves out of the team with ‘injuries’. Ultimately though, and regardless of anything else, it’s a problem pretty much of our own making and we’ll have to just suck it up but also ensure it is not allowed to happen again.

Finally for today’s news, the Champions League draw took place yesterday and it’s been pretty kind to us. We have Montpellier, a return home for Giroud, Schalke and Olympiacos (again!). You couldn’t ask for much more than that and I look forward to seeing us make it as difficult as possible for ourselves to qualify for the knock-out stages.

Right, on to this week’s Arsecast and joining me to discuss Walcott, transfers, deadlines and more, is Arse2Mouse and The Man from East Lower. Also with me, ahead of Sunday’s game against the Mugsmashers is … er … the Mugsmasher. Plus the winners of last week’s competition from GCR Books (and remember: you get 10% off any order by using the code Arseblog at check-out).

You can subscribe to the Arsecast on iTunes by clicking here. Or if you want to subscribe directly to the feed URL you can do so too (this is a much better way to do it as you don’t experience the delays from iTunes). To download this week’s Arsecast directly – click here (25mb MP3) or you can listen directly below without leaving this very page.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

And that, my friends, is that. Apart from the entirity of deadline day. Here we go …

Arseblog, the arsenal blog
August 30, 2012 posted by arseblog

Arsenal hand all the cards to Walcott as the deadline nears

Arsenal hand all the cards to Walcott as the deadline nears

Morning all,

as I write there are just over 36 hours until the transfer window shuts and as yet there has been little movement in any direction from Arsenal. Henri Lansbury has joined Nottingham Forest but we’re no clearer about the future of any of the players I mentioned in Tuesday’s blog.

More on that anon but after the reports that Theo Walcott had turned down an Arsenal contract, prompting immediate and understandable discussion about his future, reports this morning say that he’s given assurances that he ‘loves the club’ and wants to sign a new deal. There’s also confirmation that his presence on the bench was directly related to said refusal to sign.

Arsenal have apparently made it clear they won’t sell him before tomorrow night’s deadline but will, seemingly, allow him to continue at the club beyond that point based on those assurances. Now, call me cynical but I think that’s a high risk strategy. Maybe I’ve got Theo all wrong, maybe he really does love the club, maybe he’s a man of his word, but this is a footballer we’re talking about it and at the end of the day, as we’ve found out time and time and time again, they will look out for themselves and regardless of what we put on the table for him to sign he and his agents know that a Bosman move will be far more lucrative. There’s talk of a ‘short term arrangement’. Isn’t that just the last 10 months of his contract?

I also wonder why such talks with the manager couldn’t have taken place long before now. There has been uncertainty over his future since the beginning of last season so why is it that two days before the deadline closes it’s taking the intervention of the manager to make some progress, if you can call it that? It smacks of desperation and once again a week in which we had important business to do has been dominated by a player who has been essentially holding us over a barrel.

And look, that’s what players do, we know that. We know how they operate and how agents operate and yet it looks like we’re running around trying to sort out a mess that should have been dealt with long before now. And the solution, such as it is, is hardly one to be proud of. As I said, Theo could be true to his word and sign a new deal, but allowing a situation where he can delay and prevaricate until such time as he can open discussions with any club he wants is not going to instill any faith in those tasked with looking after player contracts and renegotiations. In short, this is our mess borne out of our seemingly endless vacillations.

The reality might be more simple, that even if Theo wants to go, or that if Arsenal want to cash in, it’s too late in the day for it to happen or there isn’t sufficient interest on either side. There may not be any clubs interested, although The Telegraph says Liverpool continue to sniff around, while Arsenal may have nobody to move him on to. Which again just highlights how shoddily this situation has been handled.

Reading around some papers this morning and Walcott is being painted as a good guy who has been professional and not agitated like van Persie or Song, but isn’t it a sad indictment of the game that a player who has simply done what he’s paid to do should be lauded for such behaviour? You’ve turned up for training and so on? Good man. And that’s not a slight on Walcott, it’s just another example of how footballers these days have far too much power and behave like cunts to get what they want.

Here we are with the season underway having to take the word of a player that he’ll sign a new contract when he hasn’t been willing to do that before now, and when he and his people have been happy to play the waiting game with Arsenal. It’s a huge gamble, and when it comes to gambling we know how that often turns out for Arsene. I hope that, for once, the faith and trust he’s put in a player that he’s turned into a Premier League star and an England international isn’t misplaced.

We should get further clarification from him today as his pre Liverpool press conference takes place today instead of Friday. You can make your own assumptions as to why that might be. The Champions League draw takes place in Monaco this evening but it’s not something he usually attends, it’s a club official who represents us (and even that could be interesting if Gazidis is there at a time when there’s potential transfer business to be done). Perhaps we’re planning a busy day on Friday, who knows? Arsene and Ivan were at Underhill last night to watch the club’s youth beat Marseille 3-0 in the NextGen series.

Anyway, we’ll see what he says about potential business in and out as well as hearing in more detail about Theo’s situation. What would be nice is if someone would ask him why it is we’re allowing situations like this to develop and why it is we’re having to fire-fight when we ought to be concentrating on finalising our squad for the new season. There have been many positives from the opening two games of the season, but equally, and accepting the fact that new players in attacking positions might need some time to click, there have been clear indications that this is a squad that needs strengthening if it really wants to compete for the title this season.

As Gunnerblog points out this morning, at this stage last summer we’d agreed a fee for Santos, Park had had a medical and the Mertesacker deal was in progress. This time around there doesn’t seem to be much happening. Now, it’s fair enough to say we don’t need to do the same amount of business as we did last year. It seems more important to move out some of the players who contribute little or nothing to the team, but once again we go into the final stages of a transfer window counting the money we’ve made rather than the new players we’ve brought in.

I like the signings of Cazorla, Podoslki and Giroud and I like the way we did them, but I think we need a couple more to be really competitive in all competitions this season. There’s still time, of course, but if nobody arrives and if the club ends up in further profit due to pre window departures, then every bad result, every poor performance, is going to be more difficult to cope with.

Last week Arsene said quite explicitly that he’s still ‘in the market’ and no doubt we’ll hear the usual about the right player for the right price. There’s also very pressing need to move players on to make space in the squad, so I’m going to put my optimistic transfer hat on (it’s a bit squashed) and hope that departures mean arrivals and arrivals will change a good squad to a very good squad before we head for Anfield on Sunday.

Till tomorrow.

Arseblog, the arsenal blog
August 29, 2012 posted by arseblog

Thoughts on Theo

Thoughts on Theo

Morning all,

and the madness has begun. It’s all based around Theo Walcott and his apparent refusal to sign a new contract with the club. As I mentioned on yesterday’s blog, he was one of the players I felt could leave the club this week because of his contract issue. The situation is he has less than 12 months left on his deal, Arsenal face the prospect of losing him on a free and for that reason alone his departure would not be a surprise.

Ask any business ‘Do you sell now for millions of pounds or write off that money to retain the services of a player who is clearly not 100% committed the club?’ and they’ll all take the money. Without exception, because it is the right thing to do. ‘High stakes brinksmanship’ was a phrase I used in yesterday’s blog and this could well be part of that from Walcott and his agents. Make a late play knowing Arsenal have already lost van Persie and Song, gambling that the club won’t want to deal with the PR fallout and thus get a better deal for Theo.

The thing is though, Arsenal under Kroenke have shown that they won’t be led by nose or emotionally blackmailed. They will do what they think is the best thing for the club regardless of how it appears in the papers or what the fan reaction might be. Now, I certainly think they could add something of a velvet glove to the iron fist at times, and Kroenke’s continued silence about the direction of the club is a frustration, but should Arsenal allow themselves to be held to ransom by any player? If they wouldn’t countenance it from someone like Robin van Persie I seriously doubt Theo Walcott will be any more successful.

My understanding of events is that at the beginning of last season, when Walcott had two years left on his deal, we made attempts to discuss a new contract but were rebuffed as they wanted to wait until the end of the season to see where Arsenal finished and whether or not the club had Champions League football. I have to say I found this understandable, to an extent, but somewhat presumptuous from Walcott whose standing in the game is as much based on his clean-cut English marketability than his footballing ability.

On his day he can be devastating. His pace is a fantastic weapon, his finishing is good and he can exploit space behind teams who play high up the pitch. When it’s not his day though, well, he struggles. Technique-wise he doesn’t look to have improved much at all, he’s as likely to run straight into a defender or out for a throw/goal kick as anything else, and to my mind at least there’s always been a suspicion that on days like this he’s content for the game to pass him by.

So, fast forward to the end of season, nothing happens, Walcott’s people keep their distance but his agent reveals there were ‘always plans’ to sit down and talk after the Euros. The Euros that finished on July 1st (England went home in June, Walcott was back at the club in mid-July). And it’s August 29th now and this is happening. Wenger revealed that talks were ongoing at his press conference last Friday, interestingly noting that he wasn’t taking part which suggested he’d made his position clear and left it to Gazidis and Dick Law to the necessary. From the grapevine on Sunday came whispers that Walcott’s place on the bench against Stoke was directly related to this issue.

The negotiations have, reportedly, been unsuccessful and from what I can gather the sticking point with us isn’t the money. Players will ask for many things when they discuss new contracts and while I can’t go into specifics it’s this, more than anything, that’s causing the problem. While there’s certainly a monetary aspect to it, every agent wants his player to earn as much as possible for obvious reasons, there appears to be more than that to this current situation at Arsenal. It might well be a ploy to get more money from us, just as likely it’s a ploy to make the possibility of a move to a club which will pay more money even greater.

Some sources say Arsenal are offering him £75,000 a week, and again we hear the cries of how we should pay our best players what they deserve. Yet is £75,000 a week not sufficient for a player who freely admits that he’s only ‘consistent in patches’? Time and again people benchmark against others in the squad. They complain that Walcott, for example, should get more because worse players are earning similar or greater than that. But you can’t have it both ways. You can’t complain that X player is earning too much yet use that as reference point for other salaries. If we pay some players too much then surely we need to solve that problem and perpetuating it isn’t going to do that.

It has been very interesting to read the reaction online to the possibility of Walcott’s departure. For the most part, and I realise this is as unscientific as it gets, people seem pretty much ok with it, even if there is frustration at the timing of events. After the opening two games of the season I wrote about how I felt the wide positions were areas we could really improve on and with central midfield a crowded area at the moment it would allow Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain a real chance to cement a first team place. While not ignoring Walcott’s blinding pace, something every team needs, a player at this level needs more than that.

Ultimately I’d be quite comfortable if Walcott were to depart, however, it is paramount that we find a replacement, even if AOC can fill that gap. Even if he stayed I wanted to see improvement in the wide areas and that’s obviously the case if he goes. What it looks like is, as I mentioned earlier, not really a concern for Arsenal, but to lose Song, van Persie and Walcott in one summer does suggest something of a problem. If we sell Theo and bring in a good quality replacement I think most people would be relatively happy but with just three full days to go until the window closes this makes that a bit more difficult.

And here’s where I’ll have my gripe: it’s been obvious for some time that Theo Walcott and his people have been stringing us along. When a player like him is waiting to see where we finish then you worry, and as I’ve said all along if Walcott really wanted to sign a new deal with us it would be done by now. So how have we let ourselves get into a situation like this? Why was it not brought to a head sooner this summer? If we do sell him and bring in a new player, fine, but would it not have been better for this player to bed in to his new club sooner, especially if that player comes in from abroad for all that entails?

I know we’re at the mercy of the transfer window – and this is another reason why I feel it should be closed before the start of the season – but it’s hard not to think that those tasked with handling our transfer business and contract negotiations don’t operate as efficiently as they should. I realise the timing of events is all part of the game, that as much depends on the player and his agents as us, and there’s no doubt in my mind they’ve been difficult for a long time now. However, to find ourselves dealing with something like this in the final days of August is frustrating to say the least.

There are reports about interest in Theo from Liverpool and Man City. If it’s real I say take the money, move on another guy who appears quite happy to turn his back on the manager who has given him his Premier League chance and without whom he’d be much less of a player, but spend the money and spend it well. This Arsenal side needs to bring in at least two quality players if it wants to challenge for the title and we don’t have much time to do that. And while it looked as if lessons from last summer had been learned with the early signings of Cazorla, Giroud and Podolski, we’ve found ourselves pulled from pillar to post by agents and players who don’t really care one bit for our club.

If they did, they wouldn’t behave like this, and if you can’t count on a guy who wore Arsenal kit as a kid and idolised Dennis Bergkamp then you can’t count on any of them. If this is a clearing of the decks (albeit a different kind than we had thought this summer), we have to look at how we manage our players from a contractual point of view, and why they seem so quick to snub us. We have to look at how we do our business and how it is that agents can run rings around us at times. Is there a common denominator here and if so what can we do about it?

Anyway, we’ll have to see how this pans out. The stark reality, for both sides, might be that there isn’t sufficient interest in Walcott for him to move. There’s a 48 hour deadline apparently but a resolution needs to be found. We can’t rely on goodwill from any player and Walcott is a few months away from being able to negotiate a lucrative Bosman move while Arsenal will receive nothing. If that doesn’t force our hand then I don’t know what will.

It’s another fine mess we find ourselves having to deal with in a week which was already going to be busy because of Friday’s deadline. And those tasked with sorting this out have got themselves a lot of work to do to ensure this summer is considered a success or an improvement on last year.

Till tomorrow.